Senior Training and enablement, project

The work

Gets a workforce genuinely capable with AI tools, rather than merely trained.

A defined outcome with a defined end. The scope is agreed before you start, and changing it is a new conversation rather than a favour.

The bar

You have owned delivery of this work, end to end, on something that reached real users.

Why this one is hard to judge. Attendance is easy to report. Changed behaviour six months later is the thing that matters.

What we ask to see

• A programme you ran, and what people did differently afterwards
• How you measured the difference, beyond attendance
• A named referee from the organisation, not from the training provider

One solid item beats five vague ones. A referee we can actually call beats a link to a landing page.

What gets an application declined

• The only evidence offered is a certification, a course, or a job title
• Every piece of evidence is under an NDA and no sanitised version or referee is offered
• The work described is entirely a demonstration, a proof of concept, or a hackathon
• More than six disciplines are claimed, which we read as a signal that none has been assessed

If we decline you, the reason is written down and sent to you. The software refuses a decline without one.

What it pays

Nothing is published for this discipline in the UK advertised market, so there is no figure to give you and we are not going to invent one.

Nothing published. Enablement work is bought as consultancy or training days, priced per engagement rather than per day, and none of it reaches a job board.